<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Types of Webs</title>
	<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2005/02/24/types-of-webs/</link>
	<description>A place to record notes on effective web ministry</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrias Kosasih</title>
		<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2005/02/24/types-of-webs/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrias Kosasih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2005/02/24/types-of-webs/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Interesting analogies. While blogs area really powerful and its functionality can be stretched as much as possible, it doesn't really promote much interaction and discussion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While a discussion board could be said like a cafetaria -- a cafetaria seems more like random discussions. Discussion boards tend to be specific topic oriented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analogies. While blogs area really powerful and its functionality can be stretched as much as possible, it doesn&#8217;t really promote much interaction and discussion.</p>
<p>While a discussion board could be said like a cafetaria &#8212; a cafetaria seems more like random discussions. Discussion boards tend to be specific topic oriented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
