<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religion Sites Embrace Web 2.0</title>
	<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/09/19/religion-sites-embrace-web-20/</link>
	<description>A place to record notes on effective web ministry</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/09/19/religion-sites-embrace-web-20/#comment-22316</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/09/19/religion-sites-embrace-web-20/#comment-22316</guid>
		<description>I'll visit churchmarketingsucks.com when they change their name.  

They have not marketed well to a disciple of the cross in that name choice alone.  It is
A.  Not family friendly
B.  Demeans the efforts of many good-hearted people
C.  Implies superiority of thought
D.  Reinforces that shock value is what the church should use to draw people, which we have tried, and found very lacking in sustaining growth. 

Blessings.  Let me know when this tide changes.

~A Daniel Wanna-be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll visit churchmarketingsucks.com when they change their name.  </p>
<p>They have not marketed well to a disciple of the cross in that name choice alone.  It is<br />
A.  Not family friendly<br />
B.  Demeans the efforts of many good-hearted people<br />
C.  Implies superiority of thought<br />
D.  Reinforces that shock value is what the church should use to draw people, which we have tried, and found very lacking in sustaining growth. </p>
<p>Blessings.  Let me know when this tide changes.</p>
<p>~A Daniel Wanna-be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/09/19/religion-sites-embrace-web-20/#comment-22252</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/09/19/religion-sites-embrace-web-20/#comment-22252</guid>
		<description>Sure, send it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, send it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Suh</title>
		<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/09/19/religion-sites-embrace-web-20/#comment-22215</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Suh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/09/19/religion-sites-embrace-web-20/#comment-22215</guid>
		<description>Rob, thanks for the mention of MyChurch.  If you think your readers would be interested in hearing more about it, please contact me.  I can send you a review guide, and I'd certainly be interested in hearing your candid feedback...

Peace,
joe[AT]mychurch.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, thanks for the mention of MyChurch.  If you think your readers would be interested in hearing more about it, please contact me.  I can send you a review guide, and I&#8217;d certainly be interested in hearing your candid feedback&#8230;</p>
<p>Peace,<br />
joe[AT]mychurch.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
