<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zoo.com for safe searches</title>
	<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/11/15/zoocom-for-safe-searches/</link>
	<description>A place to record notes on effective web ministry</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GtRl</title>
		<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/11/15/zoocom-for-safe-searches/#comment-25163</link>
		<dc:creator>GtRl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2006/11/15/zoocom-for-safe-searches/#comment-25163</guid>
		<description>Is 1 percent of Web sites being pornographic a lot or a little? Letâ€™s do the math.

In 2004, Google claimed to have indexed over 4.2 billion web pages (http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html). Assuming an average number of web pages for all sites, 1 percent of 4.2 billion is 42 million--that's 42 million distinct pages of pornography on the Internet.

If we use the domain count increase over the past 2 years as an indicator for the increase in websites and WebPages (approximately 20 percent), the number of pornographic web pages swells to roughly 60 million.

So is 1 percent of the Web a lot of porn? Let's put it this way, if someone spent 30 seconds to view each Web page of porn, it would take about 57 years for that person to view it all.

Or better, if you had a Playboy/Penthouse magazine that had 60 million pages in it--not including the articles of course--the magazine would be as taller than any skyscraper on earth, taller than Mt. Everest--in fact the magazine would be approximately 180,000 feet tall, 3.4 miles high.

That ... is a lot of porn.

Support the CP80 Internet Channel Initiative which is working to categorize content into Interrnet channels, allow individuals to choose what content they want to access (like cable TV) and protect children from Internet Pornography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 1 percent of Web sites being pornographic a lot or a little? Letâ€™s do the math.</p>
<p>In 2004, Google claimed to have indexed over 4.2 billion web pages (http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html). Assuming an average number of web pages for all sites, 1 percent of 4.2 billion is 42 million&#8211;that&#8217;s 42 million distinct pages of pornography on the Internet.</p>
<p>If we use the domain count increase over the past 2 years as an indicator for the increase in websites and WebPages (approximately 20 percent), the number of pornographic web pages swells to roughly 60 million.</p>
<p>So is 1 percent of the Web a lot of porn? Let&#8217;s put it this way, if someone spent 30 seconds to view each Web page of porn, it would take about 57 years for that person to view it all.</p>
<p>Or better, if you had a Playboy/Penthouse magazine that had 60 million pages in it&#8211;not including the articles of course&#8211;the magazine would be as taller than any skyscraper on earth, taller than Mt. Everest&#8211;in fact the magazine would be approximately 180,000 feet tall, 3.4 miles high.</p>
<p>That &#8230; is a lot of porn.</p>
<p>Support the CP80 Internet Channel Initiative which is working to categorize content into Interrnet channels, allow individuals to choose what content they want to access (like cable TV) and protect children from Internet Pornography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
