<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheism 2.0</title>
	<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2007/01/18/atheism-20/</link>
	<description>A place to record notes on effective web ministry</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2007/01/18/atheism-20/#comment-31672</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2007/01/18/atheism-20/#comment-31672</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to Think Christian!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to Think Christian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2007/01/18/atheism-20/#comment-31668</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.eministrynotes.com/2007/01/18/atheism-20/#comment-31668</guid>
		<description>I think part of the reason why sites like Digg and YouTube are popular methods for spreading atheist sentiments is that the overall tone of those sites is one of sarcasm and cynicism; the comments at Digg and YouTube are not where you'd go for civilized discussion. The air of cynicism makes it more difficult to target users of these sort of sites with traditional evangelistic type of messages. The "Atheism 2.0" sites mentioned are challenging new mediums that should be used to spread the gospel. An example of the type of video that could be effective is Francis Chan's 15-minute video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRi4VwcrYmA
It's a challenge, no doubt, and Christians certainly should be eager to participate in whatever virtual communities become popular on the web as another opportunity to spread the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the reason why sites like Digg and YouTube are popular methods for spreading atheist sentiments is that the overall tone of those sites is one of sarcasm and cynicism; the comments at Digg and YouTube are not where you&#8217;d go for civilized discussion. The air of cynicism makes it more difficult to target users of these sort of sites with traditional evangelistic type of messages. The &#8220;Atheism 2.0&#8243; sites mentioned are challenging new mediums that should be used to spread the gospel. An example of the type of video that could be effective is Francis Chan&#8217;s 15-minute video:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRi4VwcrYmA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRi4VwcrYmA</a><br />
It&#8217;s a challenge, no doubt, and Christians certainly should be eager to participate in whatever virtual communities become popular on the web as another opportunity to spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
